Breaking bottom of career ladder – AI transformation

What could possibly go ...

So, the CEO of Anthropic (“one of the world’s most powerful creators of artificial intelligence”) says we need to “get real” about entry-level white-collar jobs in the next few years. Pay attention! “Eyes open” to the coming job displacement.

This Axios article (much in the news cycle this past week) heralds the challenge which AI poses to the workforce. The need to build awareness, generally and among public officials. Beyond public-facing search engines and chatbots. The need for transparency on all sides (beyond the hype). The need for collective steering.

“What’s different here is both the speed at which this AI transformation could hit, and the breadth of industries and individual jobs that will be profoundly affected.”

“Market forces are going to keep propelling AI toward human-like reasoning.”

• Axios > Behind the Curtain > “AI jobs danger: Sleepwalking into a white-collar bloodbath” by Jim VandeHei, Mike Allen (May 28, 2025) – AI is breaking ‘the bottom rungs of the career ladder.’

(quotes)
Few are paying attention. Lawmakers don’t get it or don’t believe it. CEOs are afraid to talk about it. Many workers won’t realize the risks posed by the possible job apocalypse — until after it hits.

Here’s how Amodei [CEO of Anthropic] and others fear the white-collar bloodbath is unfolding:

  1. OpenAI, Google, Anthropic and other large AI companies keep vastly improving the capabilities of their large language models (LLMs) to meet and beat human performance with more and more tasks. This is happening and accelerating.
  2. The U.S. government, worried about losing ground to China or spooking workers with preemptive warnings, says little. The administration and Congress neither regulate AI nor caution the American public. This is happening and showing no signs of changing.
  3. Most Americans, unaware of the growing power of AI and its threat to their jobs, pay little attention. This is happening, too.

3 comments

  1. Eyes of AI alignment

    Being “it,” many CEOs are embracing – seeking – AI alignment in their workplace, rather than hiding – staying pat on hiring practices. So, “ready or not, here AI comes.”

    So how long wait without penalty and “Olly olly oxen free?”

    • Axios > “Ready or not, AI is starting to replace people” by Scott Rosenberg (May 30, 2025) – Business pushes replacing people with AI, but is AI ready?

    (quotes)

    Businesses are racing to replace people with AI, and they’re not waiting to first find out whether AI is up to the job.

    Why it matters: CEOs are gambling that Silicon Valley will improve AI fast enough that they can rush cutbacks today without getting caught shorthanded tomorrow.

    IBM predicted in 2023 that it would soon be able to replace around 8,000 jobs with AI. Two years later, its CEO told the Wall Street Journal that so far the company has replaced a couple of hundred HR employees with AI — but increased hiring of software developers and salespeople.

    More broadly, Americans overall say that, unlike impatient CEOs and China-fearing office-holders, they want to see AI introduced with more care and less haste, per the 2025 Axios Harris 100 poll.

  2. I whisper to AIs ...

    Coming for your jobs, ready or not. Answers are in progress … “We’re all in on this!” On the bleeding edge … Become a prompt engineer! Focus on what only you can do! (Like nuanced situations, eh.)

    Does “AI first” = “Employees last?”

    When I worked in aerospace, often my effort focused on process engineering (and managing change). Including modernization of legacy systems. As a systems engineer, I realized that there was a difference between “doing something right and doing the right thing.” As noted in the article below, “Thoughtful implementation.”

    Making tasks more efficient depended on understanding complex workflows and interdependencies (in a lifecycle context). And that included a transition phase, with staff training and support.

    • Washington Post > “No AI, no job. These companies are requiring workers to use the tech” by Danielle Abril (June 3, 2025) – The “AI-first” bandwagon.

    From Duolingo to Meta to e-commerce firm Shopify and cloud storage company Box, more companies are mandating their executives and teams implement AI-first strategies in areas such as risk assessment, hiring and performance reviews. Some of the directives are being detailed in public memos from top leaders, … Others are happening behind closed doors … The implication: AI is increasingly becoming a requirement in the workplace and no longer just an option.

    Following von Ahn’s memo, Duolingo Chief Engineering Officer Natalie Glance shared details about what the strategy meant for her team. AI should be the default for solving problems and productivity expectations would rise as AI handles more work, she wrote. She also advised her team to spend 10 percent of their time on experimenting and learning more about the AI tools, try using AI for every task first, and share learnings.

    Some directives are less about rules, and more about pushing employees to “wake up” and use AI. “Here’s the unpleasant truth,” Micha Kaufman, Fiverr founder and CEO, wrote in a memo. “AI is coming for your jobs. Heck it’s coming for my job too.”

    Additional references

    • Sourceforge > “79% of Companies Now Use AI Agents” by Community Team (June 1, 2025) – Artificial Intelligence (AI) has transitioned from a futuristic concept to a tangible asset in the business world.

    Challenges in AI Agent Adoption

    Despite their advantages, the adoption of AI agents presents several challenges:

    Integration Complexity: Integrating AI agents into existing systems and workflows can be complex and resource-intensive.

    Data Privacy Concerns: The use of AI agents involves processing large volumes of data, raising concerns about data privacy and security.

    Skill Gaps: There is a shortage of skilled professionals capable of developing, implementing, and managing AI agents.

    Resistance to Change: Employees may resist the adoption of AI agents due to fears of job displacement or unfamiliarity with the technology.

    Addressing these challenges requires strategic planning, investment in training, and clear communication to ensure successful AI agent implementation.

    • WSJ > “The AI Experience Is Going From ’50 First Dates’ to ‘Cheers’” by Steven Rosenbush (May 29, 2025) – Artificial intelligence is entering what might be known as its “Cheers” era, when every chatbot will know your name.

    • Wired (event registration) > “Rethink AI” [a digital event] – How to Unlock Meaningful Value in the New Age of Business” – June 20th (2025)

    AI is no longer just about efficiency or cutting costs — it’s about reimagining what’s possible. To stay ahead, business leaders must rethink, retool, and radically shift how they approach AI.

    WIRED, Kyndryl and world-leading AI visionaries have come together to design a six part digital event that will equip you with the essential insights, real world applications, and practical takeaways you need to lead with confidence in this new age of business.

  3. AI clinical trial injection

    A case study in … ready or not … move fast and … to replace staff … the FDA.

    • Ars Technica > “FDA rushed out agency-wide AI tool – it’s not going well” by Beth Mole (June 5, 2025) – FDA Commissioner highlighted the speed with which the tool was rolled out.

    Under the Trump administration, the Food and Drug Administration is eagerly embracing artificial intelligence tools that staff members are reportedly calling rushed, buggy, overhyped, and inaccurate.

    Makary and DOGE think AI can replace staff and cut review times, but it decidedly cannot,” one employee said. The staffer also said that the FDA has failed to set up guardrails for the tool’s use. “I’m not sure in their rush to get it out that anyone is thinking through policy and use,” the FDA employee said.

    According to Stat [news], Elsa is based on Anthropic’s Claude LLM and is being developed by consulting firm Deloitte. …

Comments are closed.